|
Air movement provides an
important and common mechanism for biological dispersal (movement
from one location to another). Each cubic meter of indoor or
outdoor air may contain thousands or even millions of microorganisms
and biological particles. These airborne particles are collectively
referred to as Bioaerosols. Examples of bioaerosols include
viruses, bacteria, fungi, pollen, fragmented particles from
microbial cells or insects, and by-products of living organisms
(e.g. animal dander, insect excrement). The size of aerosolized
particles varies between a fraction of a micrometer (µm) to
approximately 30 µm. Particles larger than 30 µm also become
airborne but for shorter periods of time.
Sources of Bioaerosols
Bioaerosols may
originate from almost any natural or man-made surface and each
source may give rise to an entirely unique assemblage of
bioaerosols. Below are examples of bioaerosol concentrations from
different environments. These concentrations are not necessarily
representative of normal or extreme levels.
|
Category |
Activity Type |
Bacteria (CFU/m3) |
Fungi
(CFU/m3) |
|
Agricultural |
animal
facilities |
103 -
105 |
102 -
108 |
|
composting |
103 -
106 |
102 -
107 |
|
harvesting,
storage |
102 -
103 |
103 -
109 |
|
Air systems |
HVAC |
10 - 103
10 - 104 |
102 -
107
10 - 103 |
|
Indoor surfaces |
ceilings & walls |
10 - 103 |
10 - 104 |
|
carpet |
103-
106 |
102 -
105 |
|
house plants |
10 - 104 |
102 -
105 |
|
operating room |
10 - 102 |
10 - 102 |
|
Industrial |
saw mill |
10 - 103 |
104 -
108 |
|
food processing |
10 - 103 |
102 -
104 |
|
manufacturing |
102 -
106 |
102 -
106 |
|
Water treatment |
aeration tanks |
102 -
103 |
10 - 102 |
|
activated sludge |
102 -
106 |
10 - 103 |
Cell or Particle Size
Cell or particle size is
an important factor in determining risks associated with microbial
contamination. In general, the smaller the particle, the greater
the risk. This relationship is due to the fact that smaller cells
and spores become trapped within lung tissue and are not easily
expelled. As previously mentioned, cell fragments can be many times
smaller than the intact cell or spore and their smaller size poses
even greater health risks.
|
1: Nasopharynx or
Head
Deposition of spores > 20 µm
2: Larynx,
Trachea, Bronchi
Deposition of spores < 20 µm
3:
Bronchioles and Alveoli
Deposition of spores <1 - 4 µm |
 |
|
Cell Size in
Micrometers or Microns (µm)* |
|
0.025 |
0.05 |
0.1 |
0.25 |
0.5 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
10 |
20 |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
viruses |
most bacteria |
most fungi, algae, protozoa |
* cell fragments can be several
times smaller than the original cell or spore
Monitoring Bioaerosols
in Indoor Environments
The goal of air
monitoring is to provide a representative sample of microorganisms
and particles present within the air that we breath. Although this
objective may appear straightforward, the process is actually
riddled with potential problems. Sampling methods must account for
a number of factors such as viable and nonviable organisms,
differences in cell size and shape, temporal variances, spatial
variances, occupant use, sampled air volumes, location of reference
samples, and infiltration from outdoor air - just to name a few.
Unfortunately, no single air sampling method addresses all of the
above issues without some assumptions. To minimize these
assumptions, an air monitoring strategy must be carefully designed.
Such studies are extremely expensive - often cost prohibitive. Even
if an adequate design is achieved, the results represent only a
snap-shot for that given sampling event.
Modern airborne sampling
employs one of three protocols: 1) impactor sampling, 2) liquid
impinger sampling, or 3) filtration sampling. Each of these methods
pulls a measured volume of air with the aid of an electric or
battery-powered pump. The air is then directed through a chamber
(or a series of chambers), guiding the spores on a specific
trajectory to a solid agar disc or adhesive medium (impactor
samplers), a liquid buffer (impinger samplers), or a filter
(filtration samplers). With the impactor method, cells or spores
are usually cultured on a suitable nutrient medium. Each organism
is then identified and reported as colony forming units m-3
(CFUs per cubic meter). One significant disadvantage of viable
spore sampling is that it grossly underestimates the number of total
cells/spores (viable and nonviable). Nonviable cells, although no
longer infectious, still exhibit the same allergenic, irritant,
toxigenic properties as viable cells/spores.
Interpreting Bioaerosol
Data
Because state and
federal standards for most bioaerosols do not exist, the most common
practice compares indoor cell concentrations to concentrations
measured outdoors during the same sampling event. This unofficial
benchmark implies that indoor counts should not be significantly
greater than outdoor counts. When indoor concentrations are
significantly greater, it is generally assumed that an indoor
amplification source exists. In other words, there is likely
microbial contamination present on indoor building materials.
Such basic approaches do
not apply to all microorganisms. Relatively high levels of one
airborne microbe may represent very low risks, while extremely low
levels of more dangerous contaminants should trigger immediate
action. Other important factors must also be considered,
including the location of air samples, frequency of detection,
frequency of sampling, type of air sampler (viable or nonviable),
and the environmental conditions. In light of such complex
variables, interpretation of air testing results are best left to
specialists with appropriate training and experience.
Fungal Bioaerosols
Originating From Building Cavities
One of the most
persistent misconceptions regarding bioaerosols is that fungal
contamination within wall, ceiling, and floor cavities poses little
if any risk to building occupants. In reality, movement of cells, spores, and
cell fragments may occur via through-wall openings and gaps at
structural joints.
Examples of through-wall openings include electrical outlets, cable
boxes, light fixtures, and heating/cooling vents. Infiltration is
affected by a number of variables such as particle size, gap/crack
size, building pressure, and wall construction.
To appreciate the
potential for cross contamination from building cavities, consider
the following:
-
Cell diameters for
bacteria and small fungal spores range between 0.5 to 4
micrometers (microns). For example, a common fungal contaminant
Aspergillus versicolor produces spores with a diameter of
approximately 2 microns.
-
The human eye can
distinguish objects in the size range of 100 micrometers and
above. So the smallest visible cracks or gaps within
building surfaces would be at least 100 micrometer in width. Most
building cracks are actually are at least 1 millimeter in width or
1,000 micrometers.
-
If visible building
cracks are at least 100 to 1,000 micrometers wide, then it can be
assumed that 50 to 500 spores of Aspergillus versicolor
(set side by side) would fit within the space of 100 to 1,000
micrometers. In non-technical terms, this would be the equivalent
of rolling a very small marble through a very large open
door-way.
In
addition to bioaerosols, many microbes also produce metabolites
called Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), which are capable of
migrating directly through building materials such as wood
sheathing, concrete, drywall, and even polyethylene vapor barriers.
Microbial VOCs are potent irritants and are often implicated as the
cause of headaches, eye irritation, sore throat, sinusitis
(inflammation of sinuses), and rhinitis (runny nose).
|
|
|